Sacrificing Indiana will solve polar ice dilemma
Hoosier state should be dug out into new Great Lake
By: Anthony Sodd
Issue date: 4/12/07 Section: Opinion/Editorial
- Page 1 of 1
|
America is in trouble and needs a martyr; I nominate Indiana. If global warming continues as expected, it will flood large, heavily populated, much-loved places around the United States. Imagine a United States without New York, Los Angeles or Miami. We've already lost New Orleans, and who knows what's next?
My plan is to dig out the entire state of Indiana, creating another great lake. By doing so, the water produced from melting polar icecaps will be diverted from our important cities to Lake Hoosier. The time has come when we must choose: lose our eastern seaboard, home to tens of millions of people, or lose Indiana, home to six million farmers who pride themselves in the title Hoosiers. Presented with the option of loosing New York, Boston, Miami and Los Angeles, or gaining another great lake, the answer is clear. Besides, would you miss Indiana? I won't.
The program to dig out the state of Indiana would be comparable to Roosevelt's New Deal, creating thousands of jobs for unemployed Indianans. The lake would further stimulate our economy by connecting the great lakes with the Ohio River and ultimately the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico. This would make it more cost effective to ship our goods from cities like Detroit, Cleveland and Chicago to overseas destinations and would ultimately make American goods more competitive in a world market.
The next challenge would be relocating 6 million inhabitants of Indiana. This problem is easily solved by looking westward to the sparsely populated Dakotas. The entire combined population of the Dakotas is around 1.5 million people, a space that large could easily handle an influx of 6 million people. (Then we can trade the Dakota's to the Canadians for Toronto and Vancouver.)
The Great Hoosier Lake that is created will become a national landmark and a testament to American ingenuity and hard work. It will create a beautiful place for our children to learn to swim, sail and fish. How does the continued existence of Indiana benefit the next generation as is? It doesn't.
Before dismissing this admittedly radical plan, think of your children who will never be able to see the Statue of Liberty, Boston Harbor or Miami Beach because our generation doesn't have what it takes to make hard choices. Your kids, or anyone for that matter, won't miss the Indianapolis 500 or Notre Dame.
The choice is clear. Indiana must go to save our country and protect our way of life. I'm sure the good, patriotic people of Indiana will be happy to drop their plows and donate their tractors to the cause of a better America- an Indiana-free America.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 7
Hoosier
posted 4/12/07 @ 7:54 AM CST
This may well be the dumbest Op/Ed I have ever read. "Loosing"? You are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. Obviously, you have never been to Indiana or to Indianapolis. (Continued…)
Rael
posted 4/13/07 @ 2:08 PM CST
so why not just dig out the dakotas since there are less people to move...seriously,,even as a joke, this is retarded
Hysterical Hoosier
posted 4/16/07 @ 1:23 PM CST
What is it with people and not liking Indiana?
Even though I go to school at Purdue and Indiana University is my rival, I'm proud to be a Hoosier.
Indianans? Who are those people? The only people I know in Indiana are Hoosiers, even if their alliance falls at another school. (Continued…)
Hoosier
posted 4/17/07 @ 3:19 PM CST
I understand that this op-ed is an attempt at satire, I also understand that it provides a glimpse of the author's (and many of the other Journal staffers, for that matter) attitude toward rural Americans--in this case, Indianans. (Continued…)
Kat
posted 4/17/07 @ 5:37 PM CST
I found this hilarious--because I'm trying out this new fangled idea called a SENSE OF HUMOR.
Besides, no matter how obviously impractical and sarcastic this suggestion is, it does show that at least SOMEONE out there is concerned about global warming and is attempting to think about how to solve it--that's more than our government can say. (Continued…)
Cray
posted 5/21/07 @ 3:13 AM CST
You had me until you said: "Imagine a United States without New York, Los Angeles or Miami." I imagined it, and damned if that wouldn't make one hell of a big improvement. (Continued…)
Post a Comment